Drown in Irrelevancy: The Commoditization of Facts
â⊠so Iâm saying that what happened to the news more than 100 yr ago, is happening now to âfactsâ, bits of knowledge. They too are being co-mo⊠comotiâŠ, whatâs the word? When something becomes tradable, a product, when something becomes a commodity⊠commoditized, thatâs the word. Facts are now being commoditized, the same way news were commoditized about 150 yr ago.â
âWhat do you mean?â
âSo basically before the invention of the telegraph, no one in Comoros would care about a tsunami erasing a tenth of the Icelandic population, not only because the possibility of caring was not even there, but also because of the minimal impact on their everyday life. âKnowingâ about the world, âstaying up to dateâ were not a thing. But with the invention of the telegraph allowing instant communication over vast distances, caring became a possibility and with it, âthe newsâ became a thing, knowing about otherwise-irrelevant events in locations you havenât even heard of, became commonplace, another form of entertainment. Opening up the newspaper or the TV wondering âWhat happened today in the world?â became a legit question, whereas a few years back that question just didnât make sense. The business of âinformingâ, of packaging and selling recounts of recent global events was created; âthe newsâ became commoditized.â
âBut surely there were newspapers already before the telegraph?â
âYeah thatâs true, I guess what Iâm trying to say is that the telegraph, the TV and later the Internet, offered this instant access to information, which transformed the business completely,. âThe newsâ became more about entertaining, rather than informing.
I mean think about it, do we care about the bombing of whatever-number of people in a city whose name Iâve never heard of before in a place so remote I cannot even place on the map? The truth is, we donât. But thereâs now a system in place whose sole purpose is to make it look like we care or that we should care. This recent earthquake in Nauru, I was bombarded with headlines of it all over the place â on social media, Youtube, my news feed â but I chose not to care. Why? Because I was sick, because thatâs precisely what they want, to get you interested on it, to get us all talk about it. But the reality is, no one cares.â
âBut a lot of people died. Apparently many deaths could have been avoided as it was known houses needed a check-up from a long time ago, but the government neglected them.â
âLook, Iâm not saying it wasnât terrible, but itâs just the new trend, the new thing to talk about, and we will all forget it in a couple of weeks or for as long as they can stretch it. Remember the Gaza strip? Itâs this blockade region sort of stuck inside Israel almost. Well did you know thereâs 2 million Palestinians squeezed in misery within 365 square kilometres? Like itâs the 3rd densest region in the world or something. Thereâs constant shortages of pretty much everything ranging from food to energy and medicines and the UN essentially said it would be unliveable by 2020 if the current trends continued, yet we rarely hear about it any more except for a few missiles being thrown here and there, because itâs now outdated, boring. And what about this conflict that has been ravaging Sudan since earlier this year? Heard of it? No? Thousands have been killed and millions have been displaced yet I havenât heard anyone talking about it.
What you are interested about is whatever they chose to be âthe newsâ and theyâll keep scrapping the world for dramatic events to report regardless of their meaningfulness to you, because the point is not to inform you, but to entertain you, but youâd been better off hadnât you heard about any of these terrible things ever. At the end of the day reading for the nth time Chinese military has crossed the median line of the Taiwan strait will only give you a good psychosis, but you look out the window and the Sun is shining and the birds keep chirping. Only local news, things you can react to, or that will affect you largely, are relevant. One could argue thereâs been two world-shattering events recently worth being informed about: COVID-19 and the war in Ukraine. The rest? Only relevant for an investor trying to game the stock market, for which knowing about the world has a practical implication.
But the worst is not even that; the worst is when the irrelevance of whatâs being presented reaches the absurd, like, let me read you some headlines: âThe two young people that fell from a balcony in <insert random location> âfell on their backs and hit their headsâ âA woman dies on a plane from XX to XX: she travelled with her daughterâ âVideo: police rescues two kids stuck in a dog cage, theyâre woundedâ âSailor who spent three months lost at sea with dog Bella reveals why he must say goodbye to his faithful pupâ âIranian chess player obtains Spanish nationalityâ âChinese zoo denies its bears are humans in costumeâ âCave diver criticizes Muskâs kid-sub rescue plan. Musk suggests heâs a pedophileâ.
But so what I was trying to get at is that this packaging of seemingly-interesting irrelevance, this mechanics of getting you to care about meaninglessness, is taking place with facts too, I guess thanks to things like Google and perhaps propelled by channels such as Veritasium and Vsauce â which on the other hand I legitimately respect. I see it particularly on Youtube, but news outlets are also feeding on this trend. Itâs just a matter of time until we have a âfactsâ feed. I mean, look at these thumbnails: âWhat supermarket ice creams are worth buying?â âWhy humans are surprisingly bad at being happyâ âWhy Locomotives Can Pull So Muchâ âWhy Progress Bars Donât Move Smoothlyâ âWhy are there no bridges in East Londonâ âWhy kids donât get as cold as adults doâ âWhy no aquarium has a great white shark?â âWhy McDonaldâs Is Better in Europeâ âWhy Are There No Big Cats in Australia?â
âBut now you do want to know why kids donât get as cold as adultsâ
âNo! I mean yes, but only because Iâve just seen that fucking thumbnail, because itâs designed to trick me, itâs engineered to mess with my curiosity, but how on earth would I be interested if I didnât even know kids were warmer than adults? Truth is, I donât give a fuck about the answer to any of those questions, in fact I didnât know THERE ARE NO FUCKING BIG CATS in Australia to start with.â
âI see what you mean, you mean those videos are answering questions that you simply didnât have or worse, you didnât even got a chance to know you had.â
âEXACTLY. I couldnât have said better, they throw answers at me I didnât even want to have in the first place, the same fucking way I donât wake up thinking âoh what might have happened today in Japan?â and thatâs the commoditization of facts, that these people are taking a question they have invented and we havenât even had the time to ask ourselves, packaging its answer into a nice, consumable and entertaining format, and profiting from the generated-interest.â
âRight basically both the news and things like Youtube have become this same out-of-the-blue interest generation and resolution machinery, creating question weâve never had before and profiting from answering them.â
âYes, and that differs from a legitimate interest that has a practicality associated with it, where deep, real understanding is built, in where like a little kid, it is the experience of the REAL world which sparks your own curiosity and drives you in a quest for more knowledge, so that you can go back to that experience and enjoy it more profoundly or repeat it in a better manner.
Like you go out there into the forest, see or heard some birds so then you start to investigate them and how to recognise them, until over time, after many iterations of bird-spotting and researching, you become an expert and identifying them becomes just pure bliss. Or like today, we wanted to make this Indian curry so weâve searched for the exact recipe, the step-by-step, weâve wondered how spicy is going to get with three chillies, and that has lead us to ponder about what causes something to be spicy in the first place, and learned that it is this active molecule, capsaicin, that irritates the skin in mammals when in contact with it, but that for instance birds donât feel spice at all because they lack these receptors, and then weâve seen youâve felt the dish much spicier than I did and so weâve wondered why do some people feel spice more strongly than others and that has lead us to discover that people actually build physical tolerance to spice, in a similar manner as we do to drugs or things like caffeine.â
âYou just discover those things because your own curiosity drives you, not because someone is throwing random questions at you.â
âExactly, and it is this random assortment of meaningless, of disconnected bits of knowledge, this randomness Ă la carte, this disguisal of entertainment as knowledge, this rise of irrelevancy, that I refuse to participate in. Next time people ask me whether I know why there are no big Cats in Australia I will say âNO!â and I will say âNO!â too, when people ask me whether Iâve heard about this terrible eartquake in Antananarivo, because that, that will be my little protest against this sea of irrelevance that the all-entertaining Internet has become, to stay ignorant, bored and ill-informed.â
If youâve liked this post, clapping goes a long way to support my writing!
Thank you!
For more thought-provoking articles, simply scroll down. But if youâd like to see them regularly, hit the follow button :)